<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: As California Goes, So Goes&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.remodelkitchen.net/2006/12/12/as-california-goes-so-goes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.remodelkitchen.net/2006/12/12/as-california-goes-so-goes/</link>
	<description>Observations on the home remodeling and construction process.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 19:34:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Rondo</title>
		<link>http://www.remodelkitchen.net/2006/12/12/as-california-goes-so-goes/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Rondo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2006 00:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.remodelkitchen.net/2006/12/12/as-california-goes-so-goes/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>In my opinion, the California title 24 rules for kitchen lighting should have been based on the percent of lumens from high efficacy lighting and not wattage.  The rule as it is stated virtually requires fluorescent lighting in the kitchen.

Check out the custom fluorescent gallery.
www.homeoptions.citymax.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion, the California title 24 rules for kitchen lighting should have been based on the percent of lumens from high efficacy lighting and not wattage.  The rule as it is stated virtually requires fluorescent lighting in the kitchen.</p>
<p>Check out the custom fluorescent gallery.<br />
<a href="http://www.homeoptions.citymax.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.homeoptions.citymax.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
